menu.header.image.unacom.logo
 

Fish predation on mangrove-associated penaeids: The role of structures and substrate

dc.citation.journaltitleJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
dc.contributor.authorPrimavera, J. H.
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T05:35:43Z
dc.date.issued1997-08
dc.description.abstractThe effect of habitat structure and substratum on predation of the greasyback shrimp <i>Metapenaeus ensis</i> (De Haan), white shrimp <i>Penaeus merguiensis</i> De Man and tiger shrimp <i>Penaeus monodon</i> Fabricius by sea bass <i>Lates calcarifer</i> Bloch and mangrove snapper <i>Lutjanus argentimaculatus</i> (Forsskal) was evaluated. The shrimp juveniles measured 6–15 mm in carapace length; fish measured 6.5–12.5 cm in standard length; structure types were pneumatophores of the mangrove <i>Sonneratia griffithii</i> Kurz and dried coconut leaf bracts; structure densities were 0, 32 and 98 pneumatophores per tank; and sediment particle sizes were pebbles, sand-granules and silt–sand. Predation on shrimp was significantly higher in controls or bare sand (48.7%) than among pneumatophores (29.9%), but not among leaf bracts (43.5%). Shrimp mortality was also significantly higher on bare sand (72.9%) compared to medium-density (54.2%), but not high-density (68.8%), pneumatophores. Fish predation on the burying shrimp <i>M. ensis</i> was affected by predator type but not by sediment size. The generally higher predation rates of snapper may be due to their habit of leaving unconsumed pieces of shrimp, whereas sea bass which devour whole prey require fewer shrimp to reach satiation. Moreover, the presence of structures did not affect sea bass behaviour of chasing prey among pneumatophores and under leaf bracts, but reduced predation by the relatively passive snapper. Predation rates among pneumatophores vs. control, and among medium-density pneumatophores vs. bare sand, were lower for <i>P. monodon</i> but not <i>P. merguiensis</i>. This may be related to the greater and more frequent use of (laboratory) shelters by juvenile tiger shrimp compared to white shrimp. The results demonstrate that the effective provision of shelter depends not only on structure type and density but on the behaviour of predator and prey as well. The use of mangrove structures (pneumatophores) by juvenile shrimp as refuge from predation is also documented for the first time.
dc.identifier.citationPrimavera, J. H. (1997). Fish predation on mangrove-associated penaeids: The role of structures and substrate. <i>Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 215</i>(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00046-4
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/s0022-0981(97)00046-4
dc.identifier.issn0022-0981
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14697/563
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subject.agrovocpredation
dc.subject.agrovocPenaeidae
dc.subject.agrovochabitats
dc.subject.agrovocsubstrata
dc.subject.lcshFishes--Behavior
dc.subject.sdgSDG 14 - Life below water
dc.titleFish predation on mangrove-associated penaeids: The role of structures and substrate
dc.typeArticle
local.subject.scientificnameMetapenaeus ensis
local.subject.scientificnamePenaeus merguiensis
local.subject.scientificnamePenaeus monodon
local.subject.scientificnameLates calcarifer
local.subject.scientificnameSonneratia griffithii
oaire.citation.endPage216
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage205
oaire.citation.volume215

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: