menu.header.image.unacom.logo
 

National Committee on Marine Sciences (NCMS)

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.unesco.gov.ph/handle/123456789/6

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Fish farm effluents alter reef benthic assemblages and reduce coral settlement
    Quimpo, Timothy Joseph R.; Ligson, Charlon A.; Manogan, Dana P.; Requilme, Jeremiah Noelle; Albelda, Ritzelle L.; Conaco, Cecilia; Cabaitan, Patrick C. (Elsevier Ltd., 2020)
    Fish farming in coastal areas is a rapidly growing industry. However, unregulated fish farming practices that release massive amounts of unconsumed feed and fecal material into the water column, can result in a nutrient enriched environment that extends to nearby reef systems. To understand the impact of fish farm effluent on coral settlement, we tested the settlement rate of Pocillopora acuta larvae on artificial substrates conditioned for 12 weeks at three sites with increasing distance (2–10 km) from fish farms in Bolinao, Philippines. Sites far from the fish farms had higher biofilm and crustose coralline algae cover. In contrast, the site closest to the fish farms, where nutrient levels were higher, had greater sediment and turf algae cover. Tiles conditioned at the farther sites promoted higher (6–8%) larval settlement whereas tiles from the nearer site had lower settlement (3%). These findings show that fish farm effluents can indirectly affect coral settlement on adjacent reefs by promoting growth of other biota that may inhibit larval settlement and by reducing the availability of suitable substrate.
  • Variation in epibiont communities among restocked giant clam species (Cardiidae: Tridacninae) and across different habitat types
    de Guzman, Ian Joseph A.; Cabaitan, Patrick C.; Hoeksema, Bert W.; Sayco, Sherry Lyn G.; Conaco, Cecilia (Springer, 2023-07-07)
    Giant clam shells provide a solid substrate for various species of epibionts. Yet, it is not well known how epibiont communities vary among populations of different giant clam species and in giant clams restocked in different habitat types. Here, we examined differences in the epibiont communities of three species of giant clams with different shell morphology (Tridacna gigas, Tridacna derasa, and Hippopus hippopus), and characterized the epibiont communities on T. gigas from three different habitat types (sandy reef flat, seagrass bed, and coral reef). Tridacna gigas had higher species richness, abundance, and cover of epibionts compared to the other two species. Tridacna gigas in coral reef habitat also displayed higher species richness and cover of sessile epibionts, while the same species in the sandy reef flat had higher species richness and abundance of mobile epibionts. Epibiont communities were more variable across habitat types than among different giant clam species restocked in a similar area. Differences in abundance of Trochus sp., Pyramidella sp., and crustose coralline algae contributed to the variability in epibiont communities among the giant clam species and across habitats. A few taxa were observed only on specific giant clam species and sites. For instance, Diadema sp. and Echinometra sp. were found only on T. gigas, and Diadema sp. was present only in the sandy reef flat. Both the complexity of the giant clam shells and habitat type contribute to differences in associated epibiont communities. This further emphasizes the ecological importance of giant clams as habitats for other invertebrates.
    The authors acknowledge Jun Castrence and the staff of Bolinao Marine Laboratory for assistance with field work. We also acknowledge the assistance of Edwin Dumalagan with coral and algae identification, Timothy Quimpo for his assistance and advice on statistical analysis, and Elizabeth Gomez for her assistance in generating the map of study sites. Lastly, we would like to thank members of the Coral Reef Ecology Laboratory (CoRE) for their helpful comments and suggestions on the study. This study was supported by a grant from the Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic, and Natural Resources Research and Development of the Department of Science and Technology to PCC and CC (QMSR-MRRD-MEC-314-1542) and a Department of Science and Technology ASTHRDP Scholarship and University of the Philippines Marine Science Institute Thesis Writing Grant 2020 to ID. We thank the reviewers for the suggestions that helped improve our paper.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Fish and benthic communities in an offshore and well-managed coral reef after bleaching disturbance in the Philippines
    Quimpo, Timothy Joseph R.; Requilme, Jeremiah Noelle; Gomez, Elizabeth; Sayco, Sherry Lyn; Dumalagan, Edwin E.; Siringan, Fernando P.; Conaco, Cecilia; Cabaitan, Patrick C. (Springer, 2023-08-29)
    Climate change is perhaps the greatest threat to coral reefs worldwide. However, there is spatial variation in the extent and severity of this disturbance, with offshore and well-managed reefs presumed to be less vulnerable to anthropogenic disturbance. Here, fish and benthic communities at the offshore and well-managed reefs of Apo Reef Natural Park, Philippines, were examined during a bleaching disturbance in 2016 and reassessed 2 (2018) and 3 years (2019) after using scuba surveys. Results showed that benthic communities varied more strongly with year attributed to changes in the benthic cover of coral. These changes were influenced by site, with some sites experiencing coral loss of 41–48%, while other sites exhibited minimal changes. Site differences in coral loss may be associated with coral cover, with sites that had high coral cover prior to bleaching incurring larger loss of coral cover. Fish communities varied more with sites and was associated with differences in the predominant benthos. The stability of fish communities with year despite coral loss may be attributed to the minimal loss of coral cover at some sites. For sites that experienced high losses of coral cover, the presence of alternative and deeper habitats may have provided shelter and food for more mobile fishes maintaining taxonomic composition within sites. This study shows that bleaching disturbance circumvents effective management, but impacts are variable even at small (≤ 3 km) spatial scales. Benthic community composition and presence of alternative habitats potentially alleviate the negative impacts of bleaching on reef fish diversity and abundance.
    We are grateful to the laboratory assistants F Castrence, R de Guzman, B Gabuay, R Valenzuela and K Adolfo for their assistance in the fieldwork. We thank the comments and criticisms of two anonymous reviewers that greatly improved the content of this manuscript.