National Committee on Marine Sciences (NCMS)
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.unesco.gov.ph/handle/123456789/6
Browse
2 results
Search Results
- Reproductive consequences of thermal stress-induced bleaching in the giant clam Tridacna croceaSayco, Sherry Lyn G.; Alabort Pomares, Ana; Cabaitan, Patrick C.; Kurihara, Haruko (Elsevier, 2024-01)Reproduction is a fundamental process necessary for maintaining a population. However, reproductive processes are sensitive to thermal stress which can cause bleaching in reef organisms such as corals and giant clams. Here we examined the phototrophic and physiological performances, particularly the reproductive processes, in Tridacna crocea during bleaching and recovery periods. Giant clam individuals were induced to bleach at heated treatment (32-33 °C) for 16 days and allowed to recover at 28-29 °C for 35 days. The control giant clams were kept at 28-29 °C. Heated giant clams showed lower phototrophic performances (Fv/Fm and photosynthesis), but their respiration and survival were similar to control giant clams. The gonadosomatic index (GSI) was lower, and the proportion of regressive eggs (i.e., eggs that are no longer viable) was higher in heated than in control giant clams. However, heated giant clams were able to maintain their egg size. In addition, T. crocea showed recovery of phototrophic potential and color of mantle but not of their reproductive output after a month of recovery. Our results indicate that bleaching reduces the reproductive output in giant clams by disrupting their gametogenesis, such as through egg resorption, but giant clams showed potential reproductive strategy, through maintenance of their egg size, to ensure the quality of their offspring. Furthermore, one month of recovery is not sufficient to restore the normal reproductive processes in T. crocea, which may delay their population recovery after a bleaching disturbance.
- Fish and benthic communities in an offshore and well-managed coral reef after bleaching disturbance in the PhilippinesQuimpo, Timothy Joseph R.; Requilme, Jeremiah Noelle; Gomez, Elizabeth; Sayco, Sherry Lyn; Dumalagan, Edwin E.; Siringan, Fernando P.; Conaco, Cecilia; Cabaitan, Patrick C. (Springer, 2023-08-29)Climate change is perhaps the greatest threat to coral reefs worldwide. However, there is spatial variation in the extent and severity of this disturbance, with offshore and well-managed reefs presumed to be less vulnerable to anthropogenic disturbance. Here, fish and benthic communities at the offshore and well-managed reefs of Apo Reef Natural Park, Philippines, were examined during a bleaching disturbance in 2016 and reassessed 2 (2018) and 3 years (2019) after using scuba surveys. Results showed that benthic communities varied more strongly with year attributed to changes in the benthic cover of coral. These changes were influenced by site, with some sites experiencing coral loss of 41–48%, while other sites exhibited minimal changes. Site differences in coral loss may be associated with coral cover, with sites that had high coral cover prior to bleaching incurring larger loss of coral cover. Fish communities varied more with sites and was associated with differences in the predominant benthos. The stability of fish communities with year despite coral loss may be attributed to the minimal loss of coral cover at some sites. For sites that experienced high losses of coral cover, the presence of alternative and deeper habitats may have provided shelter and food for more mobile fishes maintaining taxonomic composition within sites. This study shows that bleaching disturbance circumvents effective management, but impacts are variable even at small (≤ 3 km) spatial scales. Benthic community composition and presence of alternative habitats potentially alleviate the negative impacts of bleaching on reef fish diversity and abundance.We are grateful to the laboratory assistants F Castrence, R de Guzman, B Gabuay, R Valenzuela and K Adolfo for their assistance in the fieldwork. We thank the comments and criticisms of two anonymous reviewers that greatly improved the content of this manuscript.